Bible Verses About Speaking In Tongues
The Bible’s answer “Speaking in tongues” refers to a miraculous ability some early Christians had that enabled them to speak a language without first having learned it. (Acts , New International Version) The speaker was easily understood by anyone who knew that language. The Bible Speaking in tongues means speaking in a way or in a language that is not normally understood by the speaker or the listeners. The bible mentions two types of speaking in tongues: On the day of Pentecost Jesus' apostles were filled with the Holy Spirit and began speaking in other tongues.
Please enter your email address associated with your Salem All-Pass account, then click Continue. We'll send you an email with steps on how to reset your password. Bible Verses about Speaking in Tongues Speaking in tongues, or glossolalia, is Biblical, but needs to be understood. Many churches and denominations have different opinions on the gift of speaking in tongues. If you are looking to study and understand speaking in tongues, the only place to go for truth is God's Word.
Trusted Bible commentaries can help you gain more insight as well. The Holy Spirit is the one who gives us gifts and we are all given different gifts that will benefit the Kingdom of God and help others come into a saving relationship with Jesus. Let's take a look at some Bible verses about the gift of speaking in tongues.
You can also read an article that explains more about what the gift of speaking in tongues is and is not at our sister site, Crosswalk. Plus Toggle navigation. Password Assistance.
Email address. Bible Verses About Speaking in Tongues. Share Tweet Save. Chapter Parallel Compare. Acts Galatians Mark Indeed, no one understands them; they utter mysteries by the Spirit. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.
But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.
When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. But the greatest of these is love. The one who prophesies is greater than the one who what does f mean in physics in tongues, unless someone interprets, so that the church may be edified.
Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying? You will just be speaking into the air. Since you are eager for gifts of the Spirit, try to excel in those that build up the church. I will pray with my spirit, but I will also pray with my understanding; I will sing with my spirit, but I will also sing with my understanding.
In regard to evil be infants, but in your thinking be adults. When you come together, each of you has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation.
Everything must how to tag a page on facebook mobile done so that the church may be built up.
They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. Or are you the only people it has reached? Haynes Jr. All rights reserved.
Paul was not afraid of a trans-rational experience.
May 25, · Again the purpose for speaking in tongues is obvious, namely, to communicate the Gospel message. These are the only instances of tongues-speaking recorded in the Bible, except the passage in First Corinthians. None of the later Epistles mention speaking in tongues. The gift was used only in the transitional period between Law and Grace. Mar 09, · There is no indication anywhere in the Bible that people who speak in tongues lose self-control or become unaware of their surroundings. Paul insists that the one speaking in tongues can start and stop at will (1 Cor. ; ; ; cf. ). There is a vast difference between an experience being "ecstatic" and it being "emotional".
The spiritual gift of speaking in tongues remains controversial in our day and is a subject deserving of our close attention. This short article is not designed to argue that tongues are still valid but simply attempts to describe the nature and function of tongues speech.
The variety of nations represented vv. Acts ; ; ; Can this phenomenon still occur today? Absolutely, yes. But in my opinion it happens quite rarely. Some insist that the tongues in Acts 2 were not human languages. Rodman Williams, Renewal Theology , The gift of speaking in tongues that continues throughout church history and is so widespread today is the Spirit-prompted ability to pray and praise God in a heavenly dialect, possibly even an angelic language that is not related to anything spoken on earth such as German or Swahili or Mandarin or English.
The Holy Spirit personally crafts or creates a special and unique language that enables a Christian to speak to God in prayer , praise, and thanksgiving. This gift is not a human language that one might encounter in some foreign country, but a Spirit-empowered capacity to speak meaningful words that are only understood by our Triune God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit unless, of course, God provides the interpretation through the one speaking or through another believer.
So, again, how can tongues be evangelistic when the only two occurrences of tongues outside of Acts 2 Acts 10 and 19 took place when only believers were present? Neither is tongues the invariable sign of Spirit- baptism or Spirit-filling.
There are numerous instances in Acts of true conversion and Spirit-baptism where no tongues are mentioned ; ; ; ; ; ; a; b; ; ; This means that tongues is a form of prayer.
See especially 1 Cor. Tongues is also a form of praise 1 Cor. Tongues is also a way in which we edify or strengthen ourselves. It is good to take whatever steps you can to edify yourself, to build up and strengthen your soul, so that you might be better able and equipped to build up others see 1 Cor. Prophecy is to be preferred over uninterpreted tongues in the corporate gathering of the church because it is intelligible and thus can serve better than unintelligible tongues speech to build up, edify, and encourage the people of God.
But this obtains only in the absence of an interpretation for tongues. What does Paul mean in 1 Cor. In 1 Cor. If Israel violates the covenant, God will chastise them by sending a foreign enemy, speaking a foreign tongue.
This is the judgment that Isaiah says has come upon Israel in the 8th century BC when the Assyrians invaded and conquered the Jews cf. BC, Jer. When God speaks to people in a language they cannot understand, it is a form of punishment for unbelief. It signifies his anger.
Incomprehensible speech will not guide or instruct or lead to faith and repentance, but only confuse and destroy. Thus, if outsiders or unbelievers come in and you speak in a language they cannot understand, you will simply drive them away. So when you come together 1 Cor. Otherwise the tongue-speaker should be quiet in the church v. Therefore, Paul is not talking about the function of the gift of tongues in general, but only about the negative result of one particular abuse of tongues-speech namely, its use without interpretation in the public assembly.
So, do not permit uninterpreted tongues-speech in church, for in doing so, you run the risk of communicating a negative sign to people that will only drive them away.
One objection to the gift of tongues…is that nothing is of spiritual value unless it passes through the cerebral cortex of the brain and can be cognitively understood. Any notion that the Holy Spirit might engage with the human spirit directly, by-passing our cognitive thought processes, is anathema to most evangelicals. If it is to be spiritually profitable it must be intelligible. But there is a vast difference between the necessity of intelligibility for the sake of the entire body of Christ, on the one hand, and whether or not a Christian can be edified and blessed and built up spiritually while speaking in uninterpreted tongues privately, on the other.
Tongues in the corporate assembly must be intelligible or interpreted for the sake of others who are listening. When you pray in tongues in private, you are most certainly praising. But praying, praising, and giving thanks is most certainly taking place! And all this at the same time he lacks cognitive awareness of what is happening.
Shut it down. Forbid it. If Paul had been fearful of trans-rational experience which, by the way, is far and away different from being irrational , would not his next step be to repudiate the use of tongues altogether, or at minimum to warn us of its dangers? At the very least we should expect Paul to say something to minimize its importance so as to render it trite, at least in comparison with other gifts.
But he does no such thing. Paul asks the question, in view of what has just been said in v. His response is found in v. There we read that he is determined to do both! If Paul speaks in tongues more frequently and fervently than anyone else, yet in church almost never does preferring there to speak in a way all can understand , where does he speak in tongues?
In what context would the affirmation of v. Clearly, Paul exercised his remarkable gift in private, in the context of his personal, devotional intimacy with God. Again, the only grounds I can see for objecting to this scenario is the reluctance that many cessationists have for spiritual experiences that bypass or transcend the mind.
This is the man whose incomparable mind and power of logical argumentation rendered helpless his theological opponents. This is the man who is known to history as the greatest theologian outside of Jesus himself. This is the man who took on and took out the philosophers in Athens Acts 17! Yes, logical, reasonable, highly-educated Paul prayed in tongues more than anyone!
Paul not only believed in the spiritual value of praying in private in uninterpreted tongues, he also himself practiced it. In fact, he happily declares that he prays in private in uninterpreted and therefore unintelligible tongues more than all the tongue-happy Corinthians combined! But each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and one of another. Surely, then, we should not expect all to speak in tongues either. Secondly, according to 1 Cor.
In other words, Paul seems to suggest that the Spirit sovereignly differentiates among Christians and distributes one or more gifts to this person and yet another, a different gift to this person and yet another gift to that one, and so on.
Then there is 1 Cor. In Greek there is a grammatical structure that is designed to elicit a negative response to the question being asked. Paul employs it in 1 Cor. All are not prophets, are they? All are not teachers, are they? All are not workers of miracles, are they? All do not have gifts of healings, do they?
All do not speak with tongues, do they? All do not interpret, do they? The same Greek verb is used in these texts that we find in 1 Cor. Furthermore, in 1 Cor. But in 1 Cor. Some but not I insist that 1 Cor. Not everyone is gifted by the Spirit to speak in tongues during the corporate gathering of the church. But the potential does exist for every believer to pray in tongues in private. Jack Hayford argues that the gift of tongues is limited in distribution 1 Cor.
The difference between these operations of the Holy Spirit is that not every Christian has reason to expect he or she will necessarily exercise the public gift; while any Christian may expect and welcome the private grace of spiritual language in his or her personal time of prayer fellowship with God 1 Cor. Not everyone will minister a prophetic word, not everyone will teach, and so on.
Why could not the same be true for tongues? The NT never uses this term to describe speaking in tongues. The individual is perceived as losing self-control, perhaps lapsing into a frenzied condition in which self-consciousness and the power for rational thinking are eclipsed.
There is no indication anywhere in the Bible that people who speak in tongues lose self-control or become unaware of their surroundings. Paul insists that the one speaking in tongues can start and stop at will 1 Cor. Tongues is often highly emotional and exhilarating, bringing peace, joy, etc. Article originally published on SamStorms. Used with permission. Sam Storms is an Amillennial, Calvinistic, charismatic, credo-baptistic, complementarian, Christian Hedonist who loves his wife of 44 years, his two daughters, his four grandchildren, books, baseball, movies, and all things Oklahoma University.
This article is part of our larger resource library of terms important to the Christian faith. From heaven and hell, to communion and baptism , we want to provide easy to read and understand articles that answer your questions about theological terms and their meaning.
What is Blasphemy and Why is it So Deadly? What is Heresy? What is the Sabbath and is it Still Important? Heaven - What is it Like, Where is it? Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons.